Rankings Methodology

At MastersInCommunications.org, we are committed to offering insightful and well-researched information on graduate programs in communication studies. Choosing the right academic path is highly individualized, as each student's goals, financial situation, and learning preferences differ.

To help streamline your decision-making, we conduct an annual analysis of communication programs using a rigorous methodology centered on academic excellence, affordability, and adaptability. We aim to provide data-driven insights to support your educational and career aspirations.

How We Assess Programs

Our rankings rely on a structured and unbiased evaluation process. We collect and analyze data from reputable sources to ensure our recommendations remain accurate, relevant, and valuable to prospective students.

Programs Excluded from Consideration

We begin with a broad selection of graduate programs but exclude those that:

Lack of official enrollment data in the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS).
Have been discontinued or are scheduled to close during our review period.
Do not hold accreditation from recognized educational authorities.

Key Ranking Criteria

Programs are evaluated based on critical factors that reflect quality and accessibility, including:

Accreditation Status - Priority is given to programs accredited by respected organizations such as the Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications (ACEJMC) or regional accrediting bodies.
Cost and Affordability - We analyze tuition, fees, and related expenses concerning the average cost of living in the program's location.
Admission Competitiveness - We favor programs that balance selectivity and accessibility, ensuring strong academic standards while fostering student success.
Curriculum Strength and Specialization Options - Programs offering diverse tracks such as digital media, strategic communication, and public relations receive higher rankings.
Flexible Learning Formats - Online, hybrid, and part-time options are considered to accommodate students with varying schedules and commitments.
Class Size and Student Support - Smaller student-to-faculty ratios and robust academic support services contribute to a program's overall ranking.
Faculty Expertise and Industry Experience - Programs with professors with significant professional experience and scholarly contributions rank more favorably.

Reliable Data Sources

To maintain transparency and accuracy, our rankings are built on data from trusted sources, including:

U.S. Department of Education - Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE)
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS)
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
The Council for Community and Economic Research
Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communications (ACEJMC) accreditation records

By leveraging this research-backed methodology, we aim to deliver dependable rankings that empower students to make informed choices about their graduate education.

Have Questions?